Interview on The Beer O’Clock

Here’s the transcript of an interview I did for a radio show in Montreal called The Beer O’Clock in July, 2005. The interviewer was Thibault du Chene. It’s been a few years. But I still like this interview.

Thibault: So tonight our guest is Brad Warner. Brad Warner is a punk rocker, Monster Movie maker and author and Zen priest. He’s here in Montreal for the Fantasia Film Festival. How ya doin’ Brad?

Brad: I’m doin’ OK. How are you?

Thibault: So, for the people who don’t know you could you introduce yourself more than I just did?

Brad: Well - I think you said everything. I wrote a book called Hardcore Zen, about my experiences and about Buddhist philosophy, which I have been studying and practicing for the past 20 years. The book is about how it relates to my own path – which was not one usually associated with a Buddhist monk – which is being a punk rocker. I also work for a company that makes science fiction films. We make a series of films called Ultraman and we’re showing one of those films on Sunday at the Fantasia Film Festival. That’s why I’m in Montreal.

Thibault: So what is Zen?

Brad: What is Zen? Ooooh that’s a tough question. It’s Buddhist philosophy. It’s a branch of Buddhism and it’s a very ….hmm… An American I met last week was saying it’s like Buddhism without all the hoo-ha, without all the big trappings and very religious looking things.

It’s a very austere practice, very quiet, centered on a kind of meditation. I don’t even like to use the word “meditation” because I think it’s pretty different from what people usually think of as meditation. What we do is called zazen. In zazen practice you sit in the lotus posture with your feet up crossed and look at a wall for a long time. Zen is a branch of Buddhism which attempted to get back to the original teaching that Buddha taught 2500 years ago, before a lot of other things got layered on top of it, making it into something more like a religion than a philosophy. I think Zen strips away all the religious aspects.

It’s hard to use the words correctly, because when you say the word religion, people have a lot of different images what that word means. But to me, it strips away all the religious aspects and gets down to the core of the philosophy.

Thibault: Now, you just said you have a reluctance to use the word meditation. What is the difference between meditation and zazen?

Brad: Well, generally meditation means you’re sitting — and the posture is usually pretty much the same — you’re sitting in your lotus posture with your legs all twisted together and you’re trying to achieve some kind of special mental state which is usually described to you by your teacher or by books, or whatever. And you might chant, or you might repeat in your mind some kind of phrase over and over or you might kind of visualize something. There are various different practices.

In zazen you’re basically sitting in the same posture with your legs crossed and your back straight and you’re staring at a wall. But you’re not trying to ‘get’ anything out of that practice. You’re just sitting there, not particularly trying to stop your thoughts but not particularly trying to have thoughts or think about something in particular. It’s not really a mental practice, whereas, I think, meditation usually involves a lot of mental gymnastics, a lot of tricks with your brain. I think the process of zazen is a lot more valuable in the end because what you see is what’s really there, what’s really your life and what you really are without all of the trappings that you’ve laid on top of it in your mind and your thoughts.

Thibault: What is the end ‘point’ of zazen?

Brad: Ah, the end point is the beginning point. That sounds like a good ‘zen’ saying, but it really is. There’s nothing you’re trying to strive for, nothing you’re trying to achieve. It is true that if you do this practice for several years, for a decade or so, at least. In my case, it took fifteen years before I started to understand what it was all about. There is some kind of clarity of mind that you achieve. But I would also say that if you’re doing the practice correctly you can achieve a kind of clarity of mind right from the very beginning. Only you may not notice it, which is a funny kind of thing about Zen.

You need to learn to be satisfied with changes that you can’t notice. Like when you’re growing up, you don’t notice that you’re growing up. Suddenly you’re fifteen years old and five years later you’re twenty and you didn’t ‘try’ to become twenty from being five. But a lot of changes took place during that time and after the changes have taken place you can look back on it and say, “Ah, things have changed.” It’s a bit similar to that sort of process.

Thibault: Some people have criticized a lot of Buddhism in the west – that they’ve diluted it. I’ve heard of a Zen centre in the U.S. that taught their students to meditate while watching TV. Is there such a thing as couch potato Zen? Is there easy Zen?

Brad: No (chuckles) I’m afraid not. I’ve never heard about doing Zen while watching TV but it sounds pretty ridiculous to me. I’ve seen a lot of things. When I come across what’s going on in America in Buddhism in general, and Zen, a lot of it’s pretty bad. There isn’t really an easy way and that’s probably one of the reasons that real Zen is not ever going to be really big. I think, eventually it may become popular, but it won’t become popular until people stop seeking for easy ways out.

But, on the other hand, you could also say, in another way that Zen is very easy, because all you really have to do for the practice is just sit there looking at a wall, and it’s nothing particularly extraneous to that.

Thibault: Then why do people find it so difficult?

Brad: They find it difficult because they want to achieve something. They want a result. I think that’s a lot of what happens.

I haven’t heard about this watching television, but I have heard about some other practice that they were doing in American Zen called voice therapy, which I didn’t really understand. The whole point of the therapy seemed to be to try to give someone a taste of the enlightened state immediately, or something like that. Reading about what they do made me think that if you did that you’d probably have some kind of special mental experience or some kind of really exciting thing happen to you. But to me that’s not what enlightenment is all about and that’s not what Zen is about.

If you can learn to be satisfied with what you are right now at this moment, then Zen is extremely easy. But I think most of us try to run away from whatever we are at this moment. We’re trying to find something better — no matter what it is

Thibault: So are you saying that we should be complacent?

Brad: No, no not complacent. Complacency is when you kind of give up whatever you’re trying to do – there’s no hope and nothing is ever going to change. And that’s not what Zen is about. It’s a very active thing. But it’s active in that you are trying to honestly see what you are at this particular moment right now and not run away from it – which is difficult to do – so it’s not something you can take very lightly.

Thibault: What is awakening? Because a lot of people think that to practice is to become awakened, to be enlightened, to see what other Zen masters have seen in the past

Brad: You can do that…to see what other Zen masters have seen in the past. What other Zen masters have seen in the past is what they truly were at that moment. And that’s the important thing. People kind of romanticize it. So they think that the great Zen masters of the past had some great, wonderful experience of enlightenment, or awakening, or whatever they are gonna call it and they want to achieve that experience. Meaning they want to actually experience this thing they’ve read and heard about, which is completely different from experiencing your real life just as it is.

You can’t achieve somebody else’s experience. You can only achieve your own experience, and if you learn to do that, what you’ll find out is that your own experience and your own life is really something universal, something that includes the entire universe as well as your self, which sounds mystical, but that’s the way it is.

Thibault: Is Zen simply a language game? Have Zen masters simply acquired a certain way of talking consisting of particular sets of non-verbal and verbal  responses?

Brad: You’re probably talking about koans and the questions they ask…

Thibault: No. Let me put it this way; what differentiates a good actor from a Zen master?

Brad: That’s a good question. Actually I’ve seen a few good actors masquerading as Buddhist masters and what differentiates them is kind of in the quality of what they say. Because if you’re acting at it you’re always pointing somewhere else, you want to achieve this experience of “over there.” It’s not where you are right now. “If you do this then you will have the great experience in the future,” or ” I, the Zen master, have had this great experience in the past and now you can imitate that great experience if you follow my steps.” I don’t agree with at all. So that’s what acting is all about. Zen is much more straight-forward than that, much more realistic or in tune with what’s really going on at this particular time in this particular place.

Thibault: So what are some of the qualities of a good Buddhist teacher?

Brad: (chuckles) I don’t know… honesty… it’s difficult to say because when I … when I first encountered my current teacher – who’s a  guy named Gudo Nishijima – I went to his lectures, and I thought he was terrible. I didn’t like him at all. But, for some reason I kept going back.

He’s retired, well – he isn’t retired from Zen, but he’s retired from doing his lectures – but at the time he did these lectures every week. And, so I would go to his lectures and I would hate them and then I would come back the next week and go to another one. I kept doing this over and over until I finally realized that what he was saying was something very meaningful and very important, but I was resisting that.

So it’s difficult to give any kind of easy answer to what makes a good Zen teacher. It’s not like something you can see visually. It’s not like you can… you know… if he’s got a shaved head and he’s got the correct robes he must be a good teacher. It’s sort of an intuitive matter. If you come across a good teacher and you feel… (pause)

In my case — as far as my brain was concerned, as far as my thinking mind and thinking apparatus — my current teacher was terrible. But I had kind of an intuitive understanding that what he was saying was extremely sincere and extremely important, so even if I couldn’t agree with any of it, I could still see that there was this sense of sincerity coming from him. That I didn’t find very often from other people.

Thibault: In your book Hardcore Zen you’re very autobiographical

Brad: Yep

Thibault: My question is more concerned with communication. What exactly do you want to communicate with your writing and what is it that you want to say in your book Hardcore Zen?

Brad: What is it I wanted to say? It’s an interesting question. Because when I wrote the book…  I had two different teachers — I had a teacher when I was in America and then when I went to Japan I found a different teacher — and both of them told me “you should write a book.” And I thought,” I can’t write a book — especially I can’t write a book about Buddhism because I don’t know anything about Buddhism.” But I kept being encouraged to write a book.

So I just started writing a book about Buddhism and I thought that what I was writing was so strange, was so different from what I’d ever read that had the word Buddhism on the cover that there would be no audience for this and there would be no way anyone would ever publish this or would ever want to read it. So, I did what a lot of people do these days cuz it’s cheap and easy — I put up a website. And I got a lot of good response from that website which surprised me. I didn’t expect anyone to read it and here I was getting emails from readers almost every day who — some of them didn’t like it at all — but most of them did. So I continued on with that and I made it into a book.

So I guess what I’m trying to say in the book is: be honest and be sincere and look at what you really are honestly and sincerely, which is something quite difficult. I think most of us miss that and I think a lot of the trouble in the world is because people can’t look at themselves honestly. They have a lot of illusions about themselves and they have a lot of illusions about other people and those illusions are in conflict. And when those illusions are in conflict people fight with each other over nothing, over what in the end is just two different interpretations of the of the exact same reality. They’re fighting over the interpretations — which is a silly thing to fight over. It’s a lot better to just look at the real situation and deal with the real situation  than to fight over various interpretations of it.

Thibault: But I think it’s even more than difficult — it’s just not knowing how to do it, not knowing how to be honest and sincere

Brad: Hmm…it’s difficult ..I mean the practice of zazen is good because you’re sitting there quietly and just observing whatever comes up and a lot of things will come up if you’re sitting there. You’re not directing your thoughts or you’re not trying to do anything in particular except just see what comes up. You’ll see that your mind is full of a lot of really a lot of nonsense that you don’t need. It can be a very difficult process to learn to recognize the nonsense that your own mind comes up with.

I even wrote about that in the book in a chapter that I called ‘My Encounter with Demons’ but, you know, I was just trying to dramatize it a bit. When you actually start seeing the things in your mind that are just complete nonsense, that you’ve held onto very, very tightly and you don’t want to let go of, it can be really, really difficult. I actually think it’s more difficult to let go of those illusions.

I think this is why people have wars and fight and do all those terrible things — take drugs or whatever they’re doing with their lives, these terrible things that they do — because it’s easier to do that than to face what you really are, and say, “I’m just full of nonsense and most of the things I care most about are just nonsense and I need to let them go.” That’s difficult to do.

Thibault: So how does one practice more sincerely, with more desire? How does one really question?

Brad: Well really questioning is…. you just have to keep questioning and you have to keep looking and you can’t be satisfied with any answer that your mind comes up with. And that’s kind of the difficult thing because sometimes your mind will come up with great answers that seem to be really fantastic and hit the mark exactly. But it’s just what your ego is coughing up at you — all the things you’ve heard before. So you need to question everything even when you know that something is perfectly right and perfectly true you have to question that as well, you can’t be afraid of questioning.

Thibault: What I found most interesting about your book is when you were talking about dreams. You made it quite clear that a dream remains just a dream and you can have the perfect job, the perfect girl, the perfect whatever in your dream, but if you actually do get it then you realize all the hassles that come with having a job, even having the so and so perfect girl.

Brad: Yeah, I think that’s really important because you always have an illusion that there is going to be some perfect world somewhere else and if you can only get to that perfect world everything will be perfect.

In my own case — my own dreams were kind of silly. I wanted to work in Japan in a company that made these stupid monster movies and I dreamed of doing that since I was a kid and I finally got that job. And when I got that job I found  it didn’t fix everything. It didn’t solve everything.

I think that this happens to a lot of people. When you hear about these famous people who have a lot of money and a lot of power killing themselves or doing some crazy thing it’s because they have realized that their dream is just a dream. When it’s a dream it seems wonderful. When it’s your reality it’s something else entirely.

I used to have this idea that if people had a lot of money they could become more secure and this is the reason to have money because you want security and a stable situation. And  because I was in the entertainment business I would encounter people who were extremely rich and who should be very secure and very happy and they weren’t. In fact they were struggling even more than the ordinary people I knew because they were always trying to prove who they were. They were expending tremendous energy all the time just to let everyone they encountered know they were important or rich or whatever. It looked exhausting!

Thibault: Is life a problem to be solved?

Brad: Life is to be lived. There are problems and you encounter those problems and you solve them one by one and that’s the only way to live your life. So life itself is not a problem to be solved. Life is just for living.

Thibault: How is it that I’m responsible for everything?

Brad: Ah! How is it that you’re responsible for everything? That’s a difficult question. It’s really hard. I remember when I was 12 years old I was thinking about that song  ’Sympathy for the Devil’ by the Rolling Stones and there’s a line that says, “Who killed the Kennedys? Well after all it was you and me.” And I remember having this discussion with my friend “How did I kill the Kennedys? Other people killed the Kennedys – I didn’t have anything to do with it.”

What he said —he was smarter than me — was that by making the Kennedys celebrities we contributed, everybody contributed, to their death, by kind of putting the spotlight on them. So you’re responsible for everything that happens.

In some things you’re responsible for it in a very direct and personal way and some things that happen to you are more vague, or less personal. But you always have to accept that you have some responsibility and if you can accept that you have some responsibility for everything that happens to you, your life becomes better. Because you don’t blame other people or you don’t enter the fantasy, “If only this didn’t happen or if only these people weren’t so bad I would be happy now”. If you just say to yourself, “OK, I don’t understand how I’m responsible for this situation. But I am responsible for it. Then you have a lot more freedom to act and make a difference and to improve your situation.

Thibault: But you still stand as not knowing what to do.

Brad: Nobody ever knows what to do. There’s a kind of an illusion that some people know what to do at every moment and there are people who are extremely confident and act like they know what to do. But they don’t know what to do any better then you do. It’s just a pose. That’s all. Doesn’t matter who. Great politicians, great philosophers, great Zen masters. They don’t have a clue.

So not knowing what to do is a perfectly fine situation. I don’t know what to do so I’m just going to do something. And if your action is sincere and not motivated by some kind of greed or anger or some other negative quality or emotion then what you do will be right. It may not be perfect. It’ll never be perfect. It can’t be perfect. But it won’t be the wrong thing to do. You just do something that’s not motivated by greed or anger or ego, for want of a better word.

Thibault: In this book Hardcore Zen, what is there in the relationship between punk rock and a practice such as zen?

Brad: Hmmm…for me the relationship was the kind of sincerity. The thing that attracted me to punk was that it was honest. It wasn’t trying to put some kind of gloss on things and trying to make things seem better than they were.

Occasionally punk has the tendency to make things seem worse than they really are. But the best of the punk rock that came out when I was involved in it, and I think still today, is seeing things honestly and just being straightforward about it and not falling into the trappings. We didn’t want to be rock stars. We weren’t making music to try to become famous or to try to make a lot of money. We were doing it because we were musicians and this is how we expressed ourselves and this is what it was.  And so, to me punk rock isn’t just the genre – you know, the loud, fast three chord rock music. It can be just a state of sincerity, a state of actually being honest with yourself. With everyone.

Thibault: What does it mean to ‘stink of Zen’ and as a writer, how do you avoid that pitfall?

Brad: What do you mean? The pitfall of just fake awful zen?

Thibault: Yeah

Brad: Yeah …ummm…. I don’t know. Maybe I don’t do it myself! I could be awful. I wouldn’t know. But when my teachers told me I should write a book about Buddhism I looked at other books about Buddhism and thought “these are all terrible.” Well not all of them, but a lot of them were really…

Thibault: What made them terrible?

Brad: Uh…they were just dreamy, idealistic. They just had this kind of dreamy, far-off quality. They seemed to be dwelling in a lot of fantasies about, you know, far-off lands and the Buddha. They would be trying to project an image. The writer would be trying to show everybody how wonderfully Zen and how calm he was and, “Don’t you think I’m wonderful and don’t you want to imitate me and be wonderful like I am?”

And I always felt that what Buddhism showed me was how stupid I was and by extension how stupid everybody was. And all I’m trying to say in my books is, “Look, we’re all stupid, so just live with it, just deal with it.” I couldn’t write a book like the books I’d seen. That’s why I was reluctant to do it. So I just wrote and whatever came out was it. And this is the book. I just wrote about my life and said “here it is” and maybe somebody’ll like it or maybe they won’t but, anyway it’ll be out there.

Thibault: But is there any way out of this stupidity?

Brad: The way out of the stupidity is to realize your own stupidity. My  teacher’s Buddhist name means ‘the way of stupidity.’ Everybody when they become a Buddhist, when you become initiated into Buddhism officially, you get a Buddhist name and the one his teacher gave him was “the way of stupidity.”

So, once you realize that you are stupid you have total freedom because the other aspect of your stupidity is that you’re also God. I don’t like to use the word God, because it’s such a loaded word. But you’re also the sum total of the universe. You’re also the center of the universe and the center of the universe is stupidity itself. And to understand this is to be completely free from ever having to try to live up to some kind of fantasy you’ve created for yourself, and just be where you are.

Thibault: So, to finish it off, do you have any last words?

Brad: Last Words! Famous last words. Yeah — I don’t know… What do you usually say at the end of an interview…?

Thibault: What’s it all about ?

Brad: What’s it all about? I don’t know. Who knows? Nobody knows?

Thibault: You’re a Zen priest

Brad: Yeah

Thibault: Don’t you know what it’s all about?

Brad: There’s a joke that goes like that, but it’s not quite the way you said.  A guy goes up to Zen master  and says, “What happens to a person after he dies?”  And the Zen master says, “I don’t know.” And the guy says, “Whaddaya mean you don’t know? – you’re a Zen master.” And he says, “Yeah – but I’m not a dead one.”

So, knowing what everything is knowing what you’re living now. This is what it’s all about and you can’t put that into words. So sometimes “I don’t know” is the best way to put it into words. Because “I don’t know” is the admission that you can’t put it into words.

Any time you try to put what it’s all about into words, you’re limiting it. Your real experience is beyond words. Which doesn’t mean that it’s something mystical or fantastic, it’s just beyond words. Like if you go to the toilet in the morning and take a pee, you can’t describe that in words. Even though it’s a common, everyday act that everybody goes through, you can’t possibly put that act into words. And that’s the truth of every experience, from an ordinary experience like that to the most wonderful, mystical experience somebody’s ever had — it still can’t be put into words.

Thibault: Thanks a lot Brad.

Brad: Thank you. I appreciate it.

 

 

76 Responses

Page 2 of 2
  1. Mark Foote
    Mark Foote September 13, 2012 at 9:00 am | |

    Yo, Ted!- do they sleep sitting up on the three year, three month retreats? Just curious; I think they mostly do that in Tibet, if I understand correctly.

    Hope Mr. Warner’s Tassajara experience was a good one, I’m sure he’ll have some fine words to share with us this afternoon.

    Occurs to me this morning that if I substitute “ability to feel” for “ch’i” most of Chen Man-Ch’ing’s instructions in “Thirteen Chapters” make good sense. The ability to feel at the tan-t’ien being intimately connected with the ability to feel in the vicinity of the sacrum, something like that. Just a thought!

  2. Ted
    Ted September 13, 2012 at 11:41 am | |

    No, as far as I know, nobody sleeps sitting up. They all have nice comfortable beds to sleep in. It’s considered poor practice to sleep where you meditate, for obvious reasons. :-)

  3. boubi
    boubi September 13, 2012 at 3:01 pm | |

    It would be a good thing to separate the “westernized” retreats from the asian ones.

    I’ve seen on french tv that the retreatees have a nice bed, get out of their cells for meals, and so on.

    In Asia, their teacher lock the place, bring them food and water twice a week through a small opening (as in jail) and they sleep seated in their meditation box some 4 hours per night.

    “One thing that seems to awe people who hear about Three Year Retreat is the rigorous routine retreatants experience. For example, getting up at 3:00 a.m., and sleeping sitting up. Do people get used to these practices? ”
    “Recently I spoke to one of your students who had entered Three Year Retreat and what surprised him was how little leisure he had during the day–less than 1/2 hours free time? Why is there so little free time during Three Year Retreat? Why is the practice so intense? ”
    source
    http://www.abuddhistlibrary.com/Buddhism/A%20-%20Tibetan%20Buddhism/Authors/Lama%20Lodu/The%20Three%20Year%20Retreat/Three%20Year%20Retreat.htm

    Mountain people are very tough, they could pass rather easily many elite unit selections, they can endure things that town people would die. So it is comprehensible that their idea of reclusion is different from ours.
    Just try living as a himalayan, alpine or andean shepperd.

  4. boubi
    boubi September 13, 2012 at 3:08 pm | |

    Some more on the “many ways”

    ” Many Mahasiddhas lived in the world. They were farmers, they were dice players, they grew figs. Through these activities, these pursuits, then became enlightened. The thing to remember is the action does not bring enlightenment. The view brings enlightenment. Playing dice in an ordinay way does not bring enlightenement but the Mahasiddha who gainined enlightenment playing dice had one pointed, unwavering contemplation. When we see him we see a dice player, but we don’t see inside, we don’t see the yogi. So there are ways to become enlightened through ordinary activity.”

    same source

  5. King Kong
    King Kong September 13, 2012 at 4:49 pm | |

    I LOVE TYPING !!!

  6. Mark Foote
    Mark Foote September 13, 2012 at 9:19 pm | |

    “The thing to remember is the action does not bring enlightenment. The view brings enlightenment. Playing dice in an ordinay way does not bring enlightenement but the Mahasiddha who gainined enlightenment playing dice had one pointed, unwavering contemplation.”

    “The ordinary woman seeks to make herself the centre of her universe;
    the universe of the sage is at her centre.
    She loves the world, and thus remains unmoved
    by things with which others are concerned.
    She acts with humility, is neither moved nor moving,
    and can therefore be trusted in dealing with all things.”
    (Tao Te Ching translated by Stan Rosenthal (mostly), #13)

    Nice translation, I think; here’s #1:

    “Even the finest teaching is not the Tao itself.
    Even the finest name is insufficient to define it.
    Without words, the Tao can be experienced,
    and without a name, it can be known.

    To conduct one’s life according to the Tao,
    is to conduct one’s life without regrets;
    to realize that potential within oneself which is of benefit to all.

    Though words or names are not requiredto live one’s life this way,
    to describe it, words and names are used,
    that we might better clarify
    the way of which we speak,
    without confusing it with other ways
    in which an individual might choose to live.

    Through knowledge, intellectual thought and words,
    the manifestations of the Tao are known,
    but without such intellectual intent
    we might experience the Tao itself.
    Both knowledge and experience are real,
    but reality has many forms,
    which seem to cause complexity.

    By using the means appropriate,
    we extend ourselves beyondthe barriers of such complexity,
    and so experience the Tao.”

  7. JBucknell
    JBucknell September 14, 2012 at 12:49 am | |

    Brad, I think you’re great.

  8. Mark Foote
    Mark Foote September 14, 2012 at 8:40 am | |

    Thanks, Ted, for the info about the three year three month three day retreats at Diamond University (do I have that right?), and thanks Boubi for the reminder and the news about the way the retreats are practiced in Tibet.

    In the Pali Canon sutta volumes, the Gautamid advises sitting the first watch of the night (first four hours I believe), then lying down on the right side to sleep the second watch of the night, followed by sitting the last watch. Ain’t that interesting, that the Tibetans make sleeping sitting up part of their retreats, in spite of the Gautamid’s instruction!

    I think it’s a ploy to expose the mind of waking up and falling asleep, that is to say, to expose the relationship of an experience of the occurrence of consciousness taking place with the induction of a hypnogogic state.

    The Gautamid also reported that sometimes, in the heat of the day, he took a nap. And that the early morning watch was the best one for observing past lives and such.

  9. Ted
    Ted September 14, 2012 at 10:15 am | |

    Yup, making a nap midday is a pretty common practice too. We are advised to sleep at least one continuous stretch of five hours every day though to avoid getting loopy. I’ve always been curious about how a polyphasic sleep practice might work in retreat or out, but have never had the nerve to try.

  10. boubi
    boubi September 14, 2012 at 3:28 pm | |

    http://youtu.be/l9Bbu_prxJk

    how is your belly ? beating ?

  11. boubi
    boubi September 14, 2012 at 3:29 pm | |

    new try

    [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Bbu_prxJk&w=420&h=315

    do you feel happy ?

  12. boubi
    boubi September 14, 2012 at 3:47 pm | |

    another belly oriented beat

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXtJkDHEAAc

  13. boubi
    boubi September 14, 2012 at 4:04 pm | |

    yeah this one is good !

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1mU6h4Xdxc

    “Listen with joy!
    Investment in samsara is futile; it is the cause of every anxiety.
    Since worldly involvement is pointless, seek the heart of reality!

    In the transcending of mind’s dualities is Supreme vision;
    In a still and silent mind is Supreme Meditation;
    In spontaneity is Supreme Activity;
    And when all hopes and fears have died, the Goal is reached.

    Beyond all mental images the mind is naturally clear:
    Follow no path to follow the path of the Buddhas;
    Employ no technique to gain supreme enlightenment.

    KYE MA! Listen with sympathy!
    With insight into your sorry worldly predicament,
    Realising that nothing can last, that all is as dreamlike illusion,
    Meaningless illusion provoking frustration and boredom,
    Turn around and abandon your mundane pursuits.

    Cut away involvement with your homeland and friends
    And meditate alone in a forest or mountain retreat;
    Exist there in a state of non-meditation
    And attaining no-attainment, you attain Mahamudra.

    A tree spreads its branches and puts forth leaves,
    But when its root is cut its foliage withers;
    So too, when the root of the mind is severed,
    The branches of the tree of samsara die

    A single lamp dispels the darkness of a thousand aeons;
    Likewise, a single flash of the mind’s clear light
    Erases aeons of karmic conditioning and spiritual blindness.

    KYE HO! Listen with joy!
    The truth beyond mind cannot be grasped by any faculty of mind;
    The meaning of non-action cannot be understood in compulsive activity;
    To realise the meaning of non-action and beyond mind,
    Cut the mind at its root and rest in naked awareness.

    Allow the muddy waters of mental activity to clear;
    Refrain from both positive and negative projection -
    leave appearances alone:
    The phenomenal world, without addition or subtraction, is Mahamudra.

    The unborn omnipresent base dissolves your impulsions and delusions:
    Do not be conceited or calculating but rest in the unborn essence
    And let all conceptions of yourself and the universe melt away.”

  14. Fred
    Fred September 14, 2012 at 6:00 pm | |

    “The truth beyond mind cannot be grasped by any faculty of mind;
    The meaning of non-action cannot be understood in compulsive activity;
    To realise the meaning of non-action and beyond mind,
    Cut the mind at its root and rest in naked awareness.”

    “Playing dice in an ordinay way does not bring enlightenement but the Mahasiddha who gainined enlightenment playing dice had one pointed, unwavering contemplation.”

    If playing dice with one pointed, unwavering contemplation, can one really
    realize the meaning of non-action and beyond mind?

    If Zazen is just objectless, goaless sitting how does its action come to the meaning
    of non-action?

  15. King Kong
    King Kong September 14, 2012 at 6:39 pm | |

    BY BOAT ???

  16. boubi
    boubi September 14, 2012 at 8:42 pm | |

    Exactly my friend ! By boat ! But also by foot .

    @ Fred

    Why not? I’ve heard of a person who faced with her death, through a supreme act of lucidity and courage, liberated herself of whatever it is that chains us , and this is a verified story

    BTW, your vision of zazen is limited to your specific school and lineage … ask around, Michel could give you an insight of the evolution of this particular matter, the second successor of Dogen changed a bit the things …

    More of the same :
    “The mind’s original nature is like space;
    It pervades and embraces all things under the sun.
    Be still and stay relaxed in genuine ease,
    Be quiet and let sound reverberate as an echo,
    Keep your mind silent and watch the ending of all worlds.”

  17. Mark Foote
    Mark Foote September 14, 2012 at 11:31 pm | |

    If Zazen is just objectless, goaless sitting how does its action come to the meaning
    of non-action?

    Calle 13, that was clear!

    Just sitting, nothing added. How is that the same as the place of occurrence of consciousness enabling an ability to feel, that returns a spontenaeity to the place of occurrence of consciousness, to the extent required by the length of this inhalation, this exhalation? Search me!

    “The body has a thousand eyes”, I think it was Kobun said.

    The cat is upset with me, but I am listening to Rihanna, typing bananas.

  18. Mark Foote
    Mark Foote September 14, 2012 at 11:33 pm | |

    Fred drops body and mind. Mark drops the cat, if he’s not careful…

  19. Fred
    Fred September 15, 2012 at 4:52 am | |

    Ejo, Dogen’s successor, did not see that cause and effect are discontinuous events
    arising from thusness.

    Mark, it’s OK to drop the cat. Just don’t cut it in two.

  20. Fred
    Fred September 15, 2012 at 6:18 am | |

    “discontinuous moments of cause and effect grounded in thusness”

    [cause and effect are discontinuous events arising from thusness] is a different
    interpretation by the machine.

    The real miracle is that ideas can encapsulated in chemical bonds and linked
    in a biological machine then converted into sound vibrations.

  21. Mark Foote
    Mark Foote September 15, 2012 at 8:48 am | |

    Polyphasic sleep, I read in a book on Chinese monastic buddhism in the 1950′s the monks (& nuns?) got up around 3am, but were permitted to sleep sitting up in the sitting at 6am. They took a nap at 4pm, and then back to bed about 10:30pm. So that’s polyphasic!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxusDNnS0Do

    Good morning!

    “If Zazen is just objectless, goaless sitting how does its action come to the meaning
    of non-action?”-

    “When they come in the light, I hit them in the light;
    When they come in the dark, I hit them in the dark.”

    (P’u-hua, “Dogen’s Manuals of Zen Meditation”, Carl Bielefeldt, pg 156, ©1988 Regents of the University of California)

    “P’u-hua was acknowledged to be an eccentric, and if he exaggerated his role in the activity out of stretch with sense contact, at least he conveyed his experience with clarity!” -me, on my “unauthorized and incomplete guide to zazen”, online.

    “Shikan means “pure”, “one”, “only for it”. Ta is a very strong word. It shows moving activity. When you hit, that movement is called ta, so “strike” is ta. Za is the same as in the word zazen, sitting.”

    (“Aspects of Sitting Meditation”, from the record of Kobun Otogawa’s talks on the Jikoji Zen Center website)

  22. Andy
    Andy September 17, 2012 at 1:58 am | |

    That’s the first time I’ve seen Katagiri talking. A pleasure.

    Thanks, buddy.

  23. Andy
    Andy September 17, 2012 at 2:13 am | |

    @ Fred

    “The real miracle is that ideas can encapsulated in chemical bonds and linked
    in a biological machine then converted into sound vibrations.”

    37.5mb per sperm. But I think machine analogies have a tendency to go GIGO on us.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.